Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Nathan Smith's avatar

engaging and persuasive, and helpful in motivating the argument. This is kind of low-hanging fruit. And if some may find it unnecessary because we always took the despair books and the doomscrolling dismissively without bothering to explain why, that actually underscores the value of the project. Somebody should explain why! We shouldn't all just assume that it's obvious why these bestsellers are wrong!

Christian resilience is a fascinating theme, in part because it's tied up with Christian apologetics. if you really wrap your head around the amazing way that Christianity has outlived nations, languages, civilizations, empires, philosophies, and every other normal product of human history (if there's a case to be made for any exceptions, they are very few), it's really hard not to see that as a reason to give Christianity more credence as a candidate for being true. if you're planning to explain Christian resilience without including truth among the best candidate reasons, I wonder whether that argument is possible without considerable distortion. The best explanation of Christianity's unparalleled resilience really is precisely that God is moving in history through the Church. That point has been made before, for example by GK Chesterton, but that's no reason not to make it again. On the contrary, it's convenient, in a way, that people have come along who are so naively despairing as to give you a pretext for re-engaging the pleasant task of marveling at Christianity is miraculous durability. :)

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?